Control Systems

Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Control Systems

Proportional-Integral-Derivative

For processes that are able to operate with continuous cycling, the relatively inexpensive two position controller is sufficient. For processes that cannot tolerate continuous cycling, a proportional controller is used. For processes that tolerate neither cycling nor offset error, a proportional plus integral/reset controller can be used. For processes that require improved stability and can tolerate an offset error, a proportional plus derivative/rate controller is used.

Nevertheless, there are some processes that cannot tolerate offset error, yet need good stability. The rational solution is to use a control mode that combines the advantages of a proportional, integral and derivative (PID) action.

Proportional plus Integral plus Derivative Controller Actions

When an error is introduced to a PID controller, the controller’s response is a combination of the proportional, integral and derivative actions as illustrated in Figure (a).

Suppose the error is due to a slowly increasing measured variable. As the error increases, the proportional action of the PID controller produces an output that is proportional to the error signal. The integral action also called the reset action of the controller produces an output whose rate of change is determined by the magnitude of the error. In this case, as the error continues to increase at a steady rate, the integral output continues to increase its rate of change. The derivative action also called the rate action of the controller produces an output whose magnitude is determined by the rate of change of the error signal, and not the amplitude/magnitude of the error. When all these actions are combined, they produce an output illustrated in Figure (a).

PID Control Responses
Figure (a) PID Control Responses

Note that, these response curves are drawn presuming no corrective action is taken by the control action. In practice, as soon as the output controller begins to reposition the final control element, the magnitude of the error should begin to decrease. Ultimately, the controller will bring the error to zero and the controlled variable back to the setpoint.

Figure (b) below demonstrates the combined controller response to a demand disturbance.

Figure (b) PID controller Response Curves

The proportional action of the controller stabilizes the process. The integral action combined with the proportional action causes the measured variable to return to the setpoint. The derivative action combined with the proportional action reduces the initial overshoot and cyclic period.

Share
John Mulindi

John Mulindi is an Industrial Instrumentation and Control Professional with a wide range of experience in electrical and electronics, process measurement, control systems and automation. In free time he spends time reading, taking adventure walks and watching football.

View Comments

Recent Posts

Vision Sensors: Features, Concepts & Applications in Manufacturing

Vision Sensors A vision sensor is basically a TV camera connected to a computer, usually…

2 days ago

Steam Sampling for Conductivity: Instrumentation Structure

Sampling Systems The Purpose of Sampling Systems The objective of a sampling system is to…

3 days ago

How Cascade Control System Enhances Dynamic Response to Load Changes

The major limitation of a conventional feedback control system is that the correction for disturbances…

4 days ago

Cable Screens: Types & Connections

Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) is one of the key factors of consideration in the design, construction,…

6 days ago

AC to AC Power Converters with Intermediate DC Link: Types, Features & Applications

This category of AC drives that is often referred to as “Variable Frequency Inverters” is…

1 week ago

Instrumentation Systems Installation: Precautions to Take

Analog systems are normally based on low voltages and as a result, they are vulnerable…

2 weeks ago