Centralised control is usually carried out via computer software, having as inputs all the available sensors and producing signals for all the available actuators in the system. This control strategy is the most powerful, at least in theory, capable of extracting “optimal” performance. However, in practice, it requires non-standard apparatus (industrial computer data acquisition cards, communications), its tuning is normally non-intuitive (involves matrix computations) and in case of a fault the whole system may break down. That is the reason why it is not widely employed in manufacturing systems. Nonetheless, for complex strongly coupled plants, centralised control may be the only solution with a limited set of actuators and sensors. Centralised control can be implemented either in open or closed loop.
In most industrial plants, the basic extension of classical PID controller design, implementation and tuning is the decentralised control approach, where structural concepts are used to decouple the interaction between variables. The use of standard equipment and the ease of hand-tuning or understanding by non-specialist technicians are the main advantages of decentralised control technique. Nonetheless, the control effort is decomposed into two stages: first to decouple the different subsystems and then to control them. The extra effort rewards consist in simpler subsequent design, implementation and tuning.
Decentralised control tries to divide the plant and design the independent controllers for each of the subsystems as a way to handle the control of the overall plant. The information flow when implementing decentralised control in a complex plant may easily become complex and difficult to maintain and understand, with lots of nested loops, block-diagrams, many individual regulators to tune, etc. Nevertheless, a fundamental reason to use decentralised control in most practical applications is because it requires less modelling effort.
Other advantages of decentralised control are:
Undoubtedly, in present-day industrial processes, the most popular choice is decentralized PID implementation, with industrial PIDs, sensors and actuators connected to a communication network based on an industry-wide standard. At times PLCs act as middleware between PIDs and the network, and also provide the necessary set-point scheduling. Note that, some PLCs do incorporate PID calculations, sparing the need for local regulator hardware.
It is advisable to use centralised control as an intermediate-hierarchy part of a larger cascade and decoupled structure for subsystems where:
Recommended: The Ultimate Guide to Electrical Maintenance
But, note that, a centralized approach using the extra instrumentation can also be designed for enhanced robustness, but in many cases, with a significant modelling cost.
Also read:
The importance of printed circuit board (PCB) technology has escalated throughout the years with the…
One of the key challenges in measuring the electrical current in high voltage, high power…
The Concept behind Wiegand Effect Based Sensors The Wiegand effect technology employs the unique…
An accelerometer is a sensor that is designed to measure acceleration or rate of change…
The USB-6009 is a small external data acquisition and control device manufactured by National Instruments…
X-Y tables are utilized as components in many systems where reprogrammable position control is desired.…
View Comments